Sunday, 25 June 2017

'Death By Cop' English Style... Unless the public save me...

I was arrested in front of my family taken to a detention centre, my finger, hand and palm prints taken, also my DNA. I was kept in a cell overnight. I am 52 and have never been in trouble with the police before other than traffic offences - although they have been in trouble with me, and have sneaked out of accountability, and clearly now bear a nasty and deep grudge against me. I am a free Englishman, plod can piss off.

I fear I am to be crucified by Sussex Police for the pleasure of Prime Minister Theresa May and her progressive, common purpose style, quislings.

Crucified for presenting some simple logical thought to the public, and energetically asking for it to be *challenged*. I don't ask anyone to react in anyway other than to ponder and wonder and reply.

All because Theresa May demands non-muslim human sacrifices so as to make Islamic extremist and terrorists seem a bit less foreign, less alien, less imported, and make British citizens - real home grown people - seem as backwards and third worldish as the Islamists she loves - while everyone (even she) knows that in truth we are not.

The logical truths I present:-

  1. The Muslim god and Christian god cannot be the same.

    Jehovah (the christian god) and Allah (the muslim god), cannot be the same Abrahamic god.

    They cannot be the same god, unless you believe that having created the ultimate man of peace (Jesus Christ) as the best role model for mankind, then 500 years later god decided Jesus was a mistake and presented Mohammed, a blood thirsty warlord, as the best role model for mankind instead.

    No, anything considered ‘god’ could not need to perform such a u-turn and decide that man should be murderous warlords rather than men of peace and love for all mankind.
  2. Having Mohammed as a role model is incompatible with western values - for the reason set out above (Jesus is a man of peace, Mohammed is a savage).
  3. Sharia law (the law of the Koran) is incompatible with western values.

    Sharia specifically attacks homosexuals and demeans women. Western society accepts equality of sexuality and gender, it only argues over the height of the profile such things need to be given.

Hence Mohammed is a bad role model in western society and closely following the Koran (ie. Sharia) is incompatible with western society.

For stating this as a logical conclusion of my reasoning of the facts - as I now present here on one single page that anyone can read and understand - I believe Sussex Police plan to paint me as an ‘extremist’, their officers will seek to persecute me, punish me and silence me.

I have no defence of my own, I am one man with meagre resources - Sussex Police and our Government/Public Sector, headed by Theresa May are a collective of many thousands of people with huge resources stolen from myself and other free people of England. My only defence is that of the other decent people of this country - I hope with all my heart that that includes *YOU*.

If you want to save me, save free speech and to have reason restored to the UK then Sussex Police must be halted now and called to account.

Once, with your help, they drop their trumped up charges Sussex police have no reason to process the phone/tablet they seized from me -- but for the avoidance of doubt, I am happy for them to be scanned, as long as it is done immediately and not subject to their ultra lazy, oppressive and human right busting 17 week delay, and also that the names of those who financially benefit from their massive over processing of phones/tablets is published.

I was arrested in front of my family taken to a detention centre, my finger, hand and palm prints taken, also my DNA. I was kept in a cell overnight. I am 52 and have never been in trouble with the police before other than traffic offences - although they have been in trouble with me, and have sneaked out of accountability, and clearly now bear a nasty and deep grudge against me. I am a free Englishman, plod can go fuck himself.


Finally - I know what the law and CPS guidelines say - in no way did I come close to committing any criminal offence and I will not have my free speech chilled by the evil forces operating at the top of UK police forces - as I said before - plod, my servant, go fuck yourself.

Interviews etc freely given (but not to character assassinating progressives).

Saturday, 4 March 2017

What is it with #UKIP, Nuttall and his 7,000 veterans sleeping rough? Figures say its closer to 400!

In a recent speech, Paul Nuttall, UKIP leader spoke of 7,000 veterans sleeping rough:
https://alt-politics.com/2017/03/04/nuttall-we-will-stay-strong-and-radical-under-my-leadership/

However, various newspaper reports (like this one)
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/9000-ex-service-personnel-homeless-after-2071049

Say 9,000 are homeless and veterans account for 1 in 10 rough sleepers.

And this report
http://www.homeless.org.uk/facts/homelessness-in-numbers/rough-sleeping/rough-sleeping-our-analysis

says UK only has about 4100 rough sleepers in total so using these figures together, while 9,000 veterans are homeless, only around 410 are actually sleeping rough...

I am sure I have heard Paul Nuttall use this figure before and am sure I have heard it challenged, I wonder why he and his people are still getting it wrong?

Monday, 6 February 2017

Ballot by Bitcoin.

I worked out a system for online e-voting that each voter could verify as correct for themselves.

The biggest flaw with all online voting is that you have to trust the people running the election.

Unless you can verify that only real voters voted, they only voted once and their votes were counted correctly - then your vote is meaningless, even if correctly counted, it is potentially over ruled by other bogus ballots.

My system fixes all these problems - ensuring that tampering cannot go undetected.

However, I worked out a simplified system with some limitation using bitcoin(!), the main limitation of this system is that the organisers can trace how individuals voted, and votes are counted as they are cast, so giving late voters a chance to change their vote based on progress. However using existing bitcoin infrastructure means it can be used immediately and virtually 'for free' - a little 'training' of users is required as using bit coin is a little more complex than making a cross on a piece of paper.

So here goes.

(Note although I say £1 here for convenience, the amount should be a fixed number of satoshi/division of bit coin)

You open the election by depositing £1 per voter into a new bitcoin account, and creating a new account for each candidate. Voters register using whatever method you want to verify their identity, once satisfied you transfer £1 from the election account to a bitcoin account of theirs.

Once registration is complete, voters are free to establish with the organisers that only valid voters have been registered by whatever physical method is agreed.

Voting entails each voter transferring the £1 they received from the election account to the account of the candidate they wish to vote for.

Once voting is closed the, the accounts are verified - only £1's transferred from the election account, to one voters account and then to a candidates account are valid (this is not a difficult program to write, but is not currently available 'off the shelf') - the candidate with the biggest (valid) balance wins.

The vote is entirely public and can be verified by every voter. The account of each voter is only known to the voter and the organisers. No votes can be changed, no vote can be 'lost', any bogus additional votes can be identified and discarded.

As mentioned, the main limitation is that the votes can be counted as they come in which may be used to influence later votes, but if this is an issue the voting period could be short - hours rather than days even.

If these limitations are too bad, then my full blown system would be the answer - it is more private so the names of all voters can be visible so all voters can be sure they are not stooges or fake, and the count is only available to voters at the end, so later votes cannot be influenced by earlier ones.